| ||
|
||
---|---|---|
Initial Editorial Analysis Nov 1 2001 | ||
Source of Report for California | added manually by Rosatti | |
Recent Literature | [from 8 Jan 2002 e-mail from Margriet Wetherwax]: Nowicke, Joan W.;Takahashi, Masamichi; Webster, Grady L. Pollen morphology, exine structure and systematics of Acalyphoideae (Euphorbiaceae): Part 2. Tribes Agrostistachydeae (Agrostistachys, Pseudagrostistachys, Cyttaranthus, Chondrostylis), Chrozophoreae (Speranskia, Caperonia, Philyra, Ditaxis, Argythamnia, Chiropetalum, Doryxylon, Sumbaviopsis, Thyrsanthera, Melanolepis, Chrozophora), Caryodendreae (Caryodendron, Discoglypremna, Alchorneopsis), Bernardieae (Bernardia, Necepsia, Paranecepsia, Discocleidion, Adenophaedra) and Pycnocomeae (Pycnocoma, Droceloncia, Argomuellera, Blumeodendron, Podadenia, Ptychopyxis, Botryophora). In: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology Apr, 1999. 105 (1-5): 1-62. | |
Correspondence and Comments Subsequent to Initial Analysis | ||
Correspondence 1 | 8 Jan 2002 e-mail from Margriet Wetherwax see Comment 1 | |
Editorial Comments 1 | Correspondence 1 indicates that Grady Webster, author of Euphorbiaceae and some genera thereof in The Jepson Manual [Ed. 1], including Ditaxis, regards Ditaxis as distinct from Argythamnia. | |
Correspondence 2 | 27 Nov 2012 e-mail from Bruce Baldwin see Comment 2 | |
Editorial Comments 2 | Correspondence 2 indicates that the treatment of Euphorbiaceae in The Jepson Manual [Ed. 2] needs to be revised, in order to accommodate the addition of 3 waifs as well as a new, shrubby, desert species (Euphorbia jaegeri V.W. Steinm. & J. André), and because of general acceptance of the idea, based on molecular and phylogenetic evidence, that Euphorbia and Chamaesyce form a monophyletic group and therefore should be treated as one genus. [According to Yang et al., 2012, "Molecular phylogenetics and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae)" (Taxon 61:764-789), "All molecular phylogenetic studies to date support all cyathium-bearing species as forming a monophyletic Euphorbia s.l. (Steinmann & Porter, 2002; Bruyns & al., 2006, 2011; Park & Jansen, 2007; Zimmermann & al., 2010; Horn & al., 2012a). Yang et al. also provide a formal infrageneric classification in which descriptions and species lists are given for each section or subsection recognized, which also shows that all taxa included in Chamaesyce in The Jepson Manual [Ed. 2] have existing combinations in Euphorbia.] | |
Editorial Summary and Current Status | ||
Current Status | JFP-16, family name | |
Current Status Authority | not applicable | |
List of names for this Current Status category | ||
List of ICPN names in Euphorbiaceae
List of names from ICPN, Hrusa's Crosswalk, and Jepson Flora | ||
Resources of the Jepson Flora Project: | External links: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2024 Regents of the University of California
Terms of Use — Page last updated Thu Feb 29 17:02:22 2024 |
Contact Us
(510) 642-2465 University of California, Berkeley University and Jepson Herbaria 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building #2465 Berkeley, CA 94720-2465 USA |